دو فصلنامه علوم سبزی ها

دو فصلنامه علوم سبزی ها

بررسی صفات کمّی در ترکیب های کشت مخلوط خیار و لوبیا با استفاده از تجزیه گرافیکی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه علوم باغبانی و زراعی، دانشکده کشاورزی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
2 دانشیار، پژوهشکده سبزی و صیفی، موسسه تحقیقات علوم باغبانی، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرج، ایران
3 دانشیار، بخش تحقیقات زراعی و باغی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، اردبیل، ایران
4 استادیار، گروه علوم باغبانی و زراعی، دانشکده کشاورزی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
5 استادیار، پژوهشکده سبزی و صیفی، موسسه تحقیقات علوم باغبانی، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرج، ایران
چکیده
کشت‌ مخلوط به‌عنوان روشی رایج در کشاورزی پایدار علاوه بر افزایش عملکرد صفات در مقایسه با کشت خالص، سبب افزایش تنوع زیستی در اکوسیستم‌های کشاورزی می‌شود. در راستای بررسی عملکرد کشت مخلوط لوبیا (Phaseolus vulgaris. L.) و خیار(Cucumis sativus.L.)، آزمایشی در قالب طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار در منطقه ورامین انجام شد. کشت مخلوط لوبیا رقم کبری و خیار گلخانه‌ای رقم Viola به‌عنوان مناسب‌ترین کشت از نظر کلیه صفات انتخاب شد. همبستگی بین صفت وزن تر میوه با صفات وزن‌ خشک‌ میوه و طول غلاف، و صفت تعداد میوه در بوته با صفات طول غلاف و ارتفاع بوته مثبت و معنی‌دار بود. نمای چندوجهی رسم شده بر روی داده‌های حاصل از آزمایش نیز کشت‌های مخلوط لوبیا رقم کبری و خیار گلخانه‌ای رقم Viola، لوبیا رقم کبری و خیار گلخانه‌ای رقم CUB-9042 و لوبیا رقم کبری و خیار گلخانه‌ای رقم Nagin را به‌عنوان کشت‌های مخلوط مناسب انتخاب نمود. در رتبه‌بندی کشت مخلوط براساس صفات، کشت مخلوط لوبیا رقم کبری و خیار گلخانه‌ای رقم Viola به‌عنوان مطلوب‌ترین کشت شناسایی شد. براساس گروه‌بندی کشت‌های مخلوط لوبیا و خیار از نظر کلیه صفات مورد مطالعه نیز، کشت‌هادر چهار گروه قرار گرفتند. در خصوص نسبت برابری زمین (LER) کشت مخلوط لوبیا رقم کبری و خیار گلخانه‌ای رقم FC-27 با 25 درصد افزایش، سودمندی بیشتری نسبت به کشت خالص داشت. براساس نتایج این پژوهش می‌توان کشت‌های کبری×Viola، کبری×FC-21، کبری×Nagin و کبری×CUB-9042 را به‌عنوان کشت‌های با بهره‌وری بالا انتخاب نمود.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Investigation of quantitative traits in intercropping of cucumber and bean applying graphical analysis

نویسندگان English

Hossein Tajik Khademi 1
mohsen khodadadi 2
Davoud Hassanpanah 3
Raheleh Ebrahimi 4
Ramin Hajianfar 5
1 Ph.D. Student, Department of Horticultural Sciences and Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Sciences and Researches Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Vegetable Research Center, Horticultural Sciences Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education, and Extension Organization, Karaj, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Horticultural Crops Research Department, Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Centre, Agricultural Research, Education, and Extension Organization, Ardabil, Iran
4 Assistant Professor, Department of Horticultural Sciences and Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Sciences and Researches Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
5 Assistant Professor, Vegetable Research Center, Horticultural Sciences Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education, and Extension Organization, Karaj, Iran
چکیده English

Extended Abstract 
1.    Introduction:Intercropping as a current method in sustainable agriculture, in addition to increase the yield of traits compared to pure cultivation, increases biodiversity in agricultural ecosystems. The purpose of this research is to evaluate the yield components of beans in pure and mixed cultivation of cucumbers and identify the best cultivars of beans and cucumbers in terms of plant height, fruit weight, fruit dry weight, fruit pod length, plant height, plant fresh weight and number of fruits per plant. Also, the presence or absence of correlation as well as its level in the evaluated traits will be investigated.
2.    Materials and Methods: In order to evaluate the performance of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) intercropping, an experiment is conducted in the form of a randomized complete block design with three replications in Varamin region. The experimental treatments include 10 mixtures of beans and cucumbers as a mixed product and one pure bean as a control. Cucumber cultivars in this experiment include Viola, Mirsoltan, Mito, Emilie, CUB-9042, FC-21, CUB-9045, FC-27, Nagin and Negin, along with Cobra bean variety, which were cultivated and investigated. In order to evaluate mixed cultivation compared to pure cultivation at the end of the growing season, ten plants of beans and ten plants of cucumber are sampled from each plot. The samples are dried in an oven at 70°C for 24 hours and after evaluating the mixed and pure cultures, they are compared to each other using the Land Equality Ratio (LER) index.
3.    Results and Discussion:The results of analysis of variance showed that mixed culture is significant for all the evaluated traits at the level of one percent probability. Mixed cultivation of Cobra bean and Viola greenhouse cucumber cultivars has been selected as the most suitable cultivation in terms of all traits. Cultivations of Cobra bean with CUB-9042 greenhouse cucumber, Cobra bean with Nagin greenhouse cucumber, and Cobra bean were identified as undesirable crops. In terms of the stability of mixed crops, the cultivations of Cobra bean with Viola greenhouse cucumber and Cobra bean with Negin greenhouse cucumber were identified as stable crops in terms of traits. In general, it is possible to select the beans of the Cobra variety with the greenhouse cucumber of the Viola variety as the most desirable and stable crops in terms of all the traits evaluated in the experiment. The relationship between fruit fresh weight with fruit dry weight and pod length; and the number of fruits per plant with pod length and plant height are positive and significant. A polygon view was drawn to determine the best cultivation for the evaluated traits. This figure is drawn by connecting the cultures that had the greatest distance from the origin. From the origin, a line is perpendicular to each side of the polyhedron to divide the figure into several parts. In this form, crops that are located in a section with one or more specific traits show good performance relative to that trait. The multidimensional view also show that mixed crops of Cobra bean and greenhouse cucumber Viola cultivars, Cobra bean and greenhouse cucumber cultivar CUB-9042, and Cobra bean and greenhouse cucumber Nagin cultivars are suitable mixtures. Also, Cobra (bean) × Viola (cucumber) cultivar was more favorable in terms of pod length and plant fresh weight. In the ranking of mixed cultivation based on traits, mixed cultivation of beans of Cobra and greenhouse cucumber of Viola cultivars has been identified as the most desirable cultivation. Based on the grouping of bean and cucumber mixed crops in terms of all studied traits, the crops have been divided into four groups. Regarding land parity ratio (LER), mixed cultivation of Cobra bean and FC-27 greenhouse cucumber cultivars with 25% increase is more beneficial than pure cultivation.
4.    Conclusion:The mixed cultures of Cobra (bean) × Viola (cucumber) and Cobra (broad) × FC-21 (cucumber) were favorable in terms of the average traits studied. These two mixed crops of beans and cucumber were identified as crops with high utility in multivariate bi-plot analyses. In the study of the land equality ratio (LER), the cultivation of Cobra (broad) × FC-21 (cucumber) was selected as a beneficial crop with a 25% increase compared to pure cultivation. Finally, according to the results of this study, Cobra × Viola, Cobra × FC-21, Cobra × Nagin and Cobra × CUB-9042 can be considered as high yield and suitable crops.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Correlation
Dry weight
LER
Wet weight

Abou-Hussein, S., Salman, S., Abdel-Mawgoud, A., &Ghoname, A. (2005). Productivity, quality and profit of sole or intercropped green bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) crop. Journal of Agronomy, 4(2), 151-155. https://doi.org/10.3923/ja.2005.151.155

Adeniyan, O., Akande, S., Balogun, M., & Saka, J. (2007). Evaluation of crop yield of African yam bean, maize and kenaf under intercropping systems. America-Eurasian Journal of Agriculture and Environment Science, 2, 99-102.

Ahmed, M., Hamid, A., & Akbar, Z. (2004). Growth and yield performance of six cucumber (Cucumissativus L.) cultivars under agro-climatic conditions of Rawalakot, Azad Jammu and Kashmir [Pakistan]. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology (Pakistan). 62), 396-399.

Alizadeh, Y., Koocheki, A., &Nassiri, M. M. (2010). Yield, yield components and potential weed control of intercropping bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) with sweet basil (Ocimumbasilicum). Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 7(2), 541-553.(In Persian https://doi.org/10.22067/JAG.V2I3.7652

Awal, M., Koshi, H., & Ikeda, T. (2006). Radiation interception and use by maize/peanut intercrop canopy. Agricultural and forest meteorology, 139(1-2), 74-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.06.001

Banik, P., Midya, A., Sarkar, B., & Ghose, S. (2006). Wheat and chickpea intercropping systems in an additive series experiment: advantages and weed smothering. European Journal of agronomy, 24(4), 325-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2005.10.010 

Baumann, D., Bastiaans, L., Goudriaan, J., Van Laar, H., &Kropff, M. (2002). Analysing crop yield and plant quality in an intercropping system using an eco-physiological model for interplant competition. Agricultural Systems, 73(2), 173-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-521X(01)00084-1

Bolandnazar, S., Pazani, Z., &Mohammadi, J. (2011). The study of cucumber and onion intercropping. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 21(3), 135-145.

Dhima, K., Lithourgidis, A., Vasilakoglou, I., &Dordas, C. (2007). Competition indices of common vetch and cereal intercrops in two seeding ratio. Field Crops Research, 100(2-3), 249-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2006.07.008

Ghasemi, A., Ghanbari, A., Fakheri, B., &Fanaie, H. (2015). Effect of different fertilizer resources on yield and yield components of grain maize (Zea mays L.) influenced by tillage managements. Agroecology, 7(4), 499-512.(In Persian)

https://doi.org/10.22067/JAG.V7I4.43938

Ghanbari, A., Ghadiri, H., &Joukar, M. (2007). Effectof Intercroppingof Maizeand Cucumberon Controlling Weeds. Pajouhesh-va-Sazandegi, 19(4), 193-199. (In Persian)

Ghanbari, A. A., Sarparast, R., Tavassoli, A.,& Ahmadvand, R. (2022). Evaluation of compatibility and yield stability of green bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) lines. Journal of Vegetables Sciences, 11(1), 58-69. https://doi.org/10.22034/IUVS.2022.546608.1190

Gholipour, M., &Sharifi, P. (2018). Yield and productivity indices of common bean and sunflower intercropping in different planting ratios. Plant Ecophysiology (Arsanjan Branch), 10(33), 127-137.(In Persian)

Hamzei, J., &Babaei, M. (2017). Study of quality and quantity of yield and land equivalent ratio of sunflower in intercropping series with bean. Agroecology, 8(4), 490-504. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.22067/JAG.V8I4.37250

Hamzei, J., &Seyyedi, M. (2016). Energy use and input–output costs for sunflower production in sole and intercropping with soybean under different tillage systems. Soil and Tillage Research, 157, 73-82.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2015.11.008

Hamzei, J., &Kamel, J. (2019). Effect of green bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) additive intercropping on growth, potato (Solanumtuberosum L.) equivalent yield and land use efficiency under different levels of N fertilizer. Agroecology, 11(4), 1409-1422. (In Persian)

https://doi.org/10.22067/JAG.V11I4.70706

KhoramiVafa, M., Javanshir, A., ZehtabSalmasi, S., &Mohammadi, S. (2008). Evaluation of some agronomic characters of corn (Zeamays L.) intercropped with pumpkinseed (Cucurbitapepovar. Styriaca). Journal of Agricultural Science (University of Tabriz), 17(4), 75-85. (In Persian)

https://doi.org/10.22067/GSC.V18I2.73192

Mardi, M., Abbasifar, A.,&ValizadehKaji, B. (2022). Comparison of the effect of biological and non-biological fertilizers on quantitative, qualitative and phytochemical properties of Garlic (Allium sativum L.). Journal of Vegetables Sciences, 10(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.22034/iuvs.2021.541559.1180

Makinde, A., Bello, N., Olasantan, F., &Adebisi, M. (2009). Hydrothermal effects on the performance of maize and cucumber intercrop in a tropical wet and dry climate in Nigeria. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 4(3), 225-235.

Mashayekhi, k., &Mousavizadeh, S. J. (2009). The investigation of leaf number, leaf area and plants dry weight in three cucumber cultivars (Cucumissativus L.). Journal of Horticultural Science, 23(1(, 57-68.(In Persian) https://doi.org/10.22067/jhorts4.v1388i1.1911

Nasrollahzadeh, A., Chavoshgoli, A., Valizadegan, E., Valiloo, R., &Nasrollahzadeh, V. (2012). Evaluation of sunflower (Heliantus annus L.) and pinto bean (Phaseolusvulgaris L.) intercropping based on additive method. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 22(2), 79-90.

Omrani, A., Omrani, S., Khodarahmi, M., Shojaei, S. H., Illés, Á., Bojtor, C., & Nagy, J. (2022). Evaluation of grain yield stability in some selected wheat genotypes using AMMI and GGE biplot methods. Agronomy, 12(5), 1130.

https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12051130

 Parvizi, K., & Bayat, F. (2020). Investigating the effect of composition and type of chemical and poultry fertilizers on yield, vegetative and reproductive traits of field cucumber in Hamedan province of Iran. Journal of Vegetables Sciences, 4(1), 147-160. https://doi.org/10.22034/iuvs.2020.130725.1108

SedigiKamel, J., Hamzei, J., &Sadra, T. (2021). Effect of green bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) intercropping with potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) on growth indices, yield and total land output in different nitrogen levels. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 31(1), 49-69. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.22034/SAPS.2021.12776

Shojaei, S. H., Mostafavi, K., Omrani, A., Illés, Á., Bojtor, C., Omrani, S., & Nagy, J. (2022). Comparison of maize genotypes using drought-tolerance indices and graphical analysis under normal and humidity stress conditions. Plants, 11(7), 942. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11070942

Suresha, B., Allolli, T., Patil, M., Desai, B., & Abbas Hussain, S. (2010). Yield and economics of chilli based intercropping system. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 20(4), 12-20.

https://doi.org/10.3329/pa.v26i2.25964

Abou-Hussein, S., Salman, S., Abdel-Mawgoud, A., &Ghoname, A. (2005). Productivity, quality and profit of sole or intercropped green bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) crop. Journal of Agronomy, 4(2), 151-155. https://doi.org/10.3923/ja.2005.151.155 
Adeniyan, O., Akande, S., Balogun, M., & Saka, J. (2007). Evaluation of crop yield of African yam bean, maize and kenaf under intercropping systems. America-Eurasian Journal of Agriculture and Environment Science, 2, 99-102. 
Ahmed, M., Hamid, A., & Akbar, Z. (2004). Growth and yield performance of six cucumber (Cucumissativus L.) cultivars under agro-climatic conditions of Rawalakot, Azad Jammu and Kashmir [Pakistan]. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology (Pakistan). 62), 396-399.
Alizadeh, Y., Koocheki, A., &Nassiri, M. M. (2010). Yield, yield components and potential weed control of intercropping bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) with sweet basil (Ocimumbasilicum). Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 7(2), 541-553.(In Persian https://doi.org/10.22067/JAG.V2I3.7652
Awal, M., Koshi, H., & Ikeda, T. (2006). Radiation interception and use by maize/peanut intercrop canopy. Agricultural and forest meteorology, 139(1-2), 74-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.06.001
Banik, P., Midya, A., Sarkar, B., & Ghose, S. (2006). Wheat and chickpea intercropping systems in an additive series experiment: advantages and weed smothering. European Journal of agronomy, 24(4), 325-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2005.10.010  
Baumann, D., Bastiaans, L., Goudriaan, J., Van Laar, H., &Kropff, M. (2002). Analysing crop yield and plant quality in an intercropping system using an eco-physiological model for interplant competition. Agricultural Systems, 73(2), 173-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-521X(01)00084-1
Bolandnazar, S., Pazani, Z., &Mohammadi, J. (2011). The study of cucumber and onion intercropping. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 21(3), 135-145. 
Dhima, K., Lithourgidis, A., Vasilakoglou, I., &Dordas, C. (2007). Competition indices of common vetch and cereal intercrops in two seeding ratio. Field Crops Research, 100(2-3), 249-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2006.07.008
Ghasemi, A., Ghanbari, A., Fakheri, B., &Fanaie, H. (2015). Effect of different fertilizer resources on yield and yield components of grain maize (Zea mays L.) influenced by tillage managements. Agroecology, 7(4), 499-512.(In Persian)
https://doi.org/10.22067/JAG.V7I4.43938
Ghanbari, A., Ghadiri, H., &Joukar, M. (2007). Effectof Intercroppingof Maizeand Cucumberon Controlling Weeds. Pajouhesh-va-Sazandegi, 19(4), 193-199. (In Persian)
Ghanbari, A. A., Sarparast, R., Tavassoli, A.,& Ahmadvand, R. (2022). Evaluation of compatibility and yield stability of green bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) lines. Journal of Vegetables Sciences, 11(1), 58-69. https://doi.org/10.22034/IUVS.2022.546608.1190
Gholipour, M., &Sharifi, P. (2018). Yield and productivity indices of common bean and sunflower intercropping in different planting ratios. Plant Ecophysiology (Arsanjan Branch), 10(33), 127-137.(In Persian)
Hamzei, J., &Babaei, M. (2017). Study of quality and quantity of yield and land equivalent ratio of sunflower in intercropping series with bean. Agroecology, 8(4), 490-504. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.22067/JAG.V8I4.37250
Hamzei, J., &Seyyedi, M. (2016). Energy use and input–output costs for sunflower production in sole and intercropping with soybean under different tillage systems. Soil and Tillage Research, 157, 73-82. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2015.11.008
Hamzei, J., &Kamel, J. (2019). Effect of green bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) additive intercropping on growth, potato (Solanumtuberosum L.) equivalent yield and land use efficiency under different levels of N fertilizer. Agroecology, 11(4), 1409-1422. (In Persian)
https://doi.org/10.22067/JAG.V11I4.70706
KhoramiVafa, M., Javanshir, A., ZehtabSalmasi, S., &Mohammadi, S. (2008). Evaluation of some agronomic characters of corn (Zeamays L.) intercropped with pumpkinseed (Cucurbitapepovar. Styriaca). Journal of Agricultural Science (University of Tabriz), 17(4), 75-85. (In Persian)
https://doi.org/10.22067/GSC.V18I2.73192
Mardi, M., Abbasifar, A.,&ValizadehKaji, B. (2022). Comparison of the effect of biological and non-biological fertilizers on quantitative, qualitative and phytochemical properties of Garlic (Allium sativum L.). Journal of Vegetables Sciences, 10(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.22034/iuvs.2021.541559.1180
Makinde, A., Bello, N., Olasantan, F., &Adebisi, M. (2009). Hydrothermal effects on the performance of maize and cucumber intercrop in a tropical wet and dry climate in Nigeria. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 4(3), 225-235.
Mashayekhi, k., &Mousavizadeh, S. J. (2009). The investigation of leaf number, leaf area and plants dry weight in three cucumber cultivars (Cucumissativus L.). Journal of Horticultural Science, 23(1(, 57-68.(In Persian) https://doi.org/10.22067/jhorts4.v1388i1.1911
Nasrollahzadeh, A., Chavoshgoli, A., Valizadegan, E., Valiloo, R., &Nasrollahzadeh, V. (2012). Evaluation of sunflower (Heliantus annus L.) and pinto bean (Phaseolusvulgaris L.) intercropping based on additive method. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 22(2), 79-90. 
Omrani, A., Omrani, S., Khodarahmi, M., Shojaei, S. H., Illés, Á., Bojtor, C., & Nagy, J. (2022). Evaluation of grain yield stability in some selected wheat genotypes using AMMI and GGE biplot methods. Agronomy, 12(5), 1130.
https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12051130
 Parvizi, K., & Bayat, F. (2020). Investigating the effect of composition and type of chemical and poultry fertilizers on yield, vegetative and reproductive traits of field cucumber in Hamedan province of Iran. Journal of Vegetables Sciences, 4(1), 147-160. https://doi.org/10.22034/iuvs.2020.130725.1108
SedigiKamel, J., Hamzei, J., &Sadra, T. (2021). Effect of green bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) intercropping with potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) on growth indices, yield and total land output in different nitrogen levels. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 31(1), 49-69. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.22034/SAPS.2021.12776
Shojaei, S. H., Mostafavi, K., Omrani, A., Illés, Á., Bojtor, C., Omrani, S., & Nagy, J. (2022). Comparison of maize genotypes using drought-tolerance indices and graphical analysis under normal and humidity stress conditions. Plants, 11(7), 942. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11070942
Suresha, B., Allolli, T., Patil, M., Desai, B., & Abbas Hussain, S. (2010). Yield and economics of chilli based intercropping system. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 20(4), 12-20.
https://doi.org/10.3329/pa.v26i2.25964
دوره 8، شماره 16 - شماره پیاپی 2
دو فصلنامه علوم سبزی ها- پاییز و زمستان 1403
دی 1403
صفحه 1-14

  • تاریخ دریافت 27 خرداد 1401
  • تاریخ بازنگری 03 مرداد 1401
  • تاریخ پذیرش 04 مرداد 1401