Journal of Vegetables Sciences

Journal of Vegetables Sciences

Antagonistic Evaluation of Some Fungal Isolates on Knot-Producing Nematode (Meloidogyne javanica) of Cucumber in Vitro and Greenhouse Conditions

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 M. Sc student, Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran
2 Assistant Professorof plant protection-Ilam University,Ilam., Iran
3 Agriculture Organization
Abstract
Extended Abstract

Introduction: Plant parasitic nematodes cause important economic losses in agricultural crops. Knot-producing nematode, Meloidogyne javanica is the most destructive of many crops in the world. In order to control plant nematodes as one of the important plant pathogens, various methods such as, fallow and crop rotation, cultivation of resistant cultivars, biological control and chemical methods are used. Today, due to the excessive use of agricultural pesticides, the health of the consumer community and the environment are endangered. Because of the chitin and protein are as dominant compositions in middle layer of the eggshell, using of the chitinases and proteases produced as degrading enzymes in a wide range of the fungi is a good strategy for biological control of the on knot-producing nematode. The disintegration of nematode eggs can only be caused by enzymatic action. Activity of the fungal egg-parasites leads to immobility and death of the embryo and results in a reduction of nematode population density. Many natural enemies of plant parasitic nematodes occur that may be useful for biological control. These include pathogens, predators, competitors and antagonists of which 76% are fungi. The fungal antagonists have been most extensively studied and are considered the most applicable for biological control of nematodes. The use of biological agents to control of plant-parasitic nematodes is less effective compared with chemical method, but positive result of fungal agents has been encouraging. In this study has tried to be examined considerable ability of the various antagonistic fungi to control of M. javanica in vitro and greenhouse conditions.
Materials and Methods: In this study has tried to be examined antagonistic ability of seven isolates of five fungal genus including: Fusarium solani, Fusarium oxysporum, Fusarium equiseti, Paecilomyces sp., Trichoderma atroviridae, Ulocladium dauci and Alternaria alternata on knot-producing nematode in vitro and greenhouse conditions. The ability of the protease enzyme production of fungal isolates was also evaluated. The protease specific activity assay in 7 isolates of various species of fungi obtained from infected knot-producing nematode over 5 days of fungal growth (24, 48, 72, 96 and 120 h) was measured. Also evaluation was performed in vitro by calculating the percentage of parasitized eggs and larvae in water-agar and also in the greenhouse by examining the growth factors of cucumber under the antagonistic effect of fungal isolates on nematodes. The ability of antagonistic activity of the fungi on the eggs was evaluated in water-agar medium with evaluation of the interaction between fungi and eggs. The numbers of healthy and parasitized (dead) larvaes and eggs were calculated after two weeks. The ability of the antagonistic fungi under greenhouse conditions was done. To provide of fungal inoculum, 20g of soaked wheat seed were cast in bags with autoclave capability. Per every gram of casted seed, 2 ml distilled water were added and during 24 hours they autoclaved 3 times. Then to every of bag number of 4 fungi disk with 5 mm diameter from selected isolates was added in 3 repetitions and was kept in 25ºC and dark conditions. To colonization all of the seeds and to avoid of hang of them, every 48 hours interval the seeds in bags were mixed. After three weeks all of the seeds were infected with fungal isolates. The ability of the antagonistic fungi under greenhouse conditions was done by adding fungal inoculum and the numbers of 2000 eggs to each pot and evaluation of performance traits of cucumber in pot after 90 days. In every two conditions, data analysis ANOVA (Analysis of variance) was conducted using of the SAS software version 9.4 in completely randomized design (CRD) with three replicates.
Results and Discussion: Analysis of variance of evaluation results in vitro and greenhouse conditions showed significant difference among isolates in 1% level. Results showed there is direct relation between increase in plant yield and add fungal isolates to the pot. The results of antagonistic ability of fungal isolates in vitro and greenhouse showed there is good correlation between two conditions. So the results showed a positive effect of the fungal isolates in reducing nematode damages.
Conclusions: Finally, based on all of the evaluations F. equiseti isolate was reported as the most effective isolate an F. oxysporum isolate as the least effective antagonist fungus.
Keywords

Alexopoulos, A. A., Kondylis, A., and Passam, H. C. (2007). Fruit yield and quality of watermelon in relation to grafting. J. Food Agric. Environ. 5, 178–179.
Colla, G., Perez-Alfocea, F., and Schwarz, D. (2017). Vegetable Grafting, Principles and Practices. CAB International. 286p.
Colla, G., Rouphael, Y., Cardarelli, M., and Rea, E. (2006). Effect of salinity on yield, fruit quality, leaf gas exchange, and mineral composition of grafted watermelon plants. HortScience 41, 622–627.
Crinò, P., Lo Bianco, C., Rouphael, Y., Colla, G., Saccardo, F., and Paratore, A. (2007). Evaluation of rootstock resistance to Fusarium wilt and gummy stem blight and effect on yield and quality of a grafted ‘Inodorus’ melon. HortScience42, 521–525.
Cushman, K. E., and Huan, J. (2008). Performance of four triploid watermelon cultivars grafted onto five rootstock genotypes: yield and fruit quality under commercial growing conditions. Acta Hortic. 782, 335–337.
Hassanzadeh, K. (2016). Guide for Cultivation of Medicinal Plants (Lamiaceae family). Ghlam azam. (In Farsi)
Huitrón, M. V., Diaz, M., Dianez, F., and Camacho, F. (2007). The effect of various rootstocks on triploid watermelon yield and qualify. J. Food Agric. Environ. 5, 344–348.
Kashi, A., Salehi, R., Javanpour, R. (2008). Grafting Technology in Vegetable Crop Production. Amoozesh Keshavarzi. (In Farsi)
Khah, E. M., Kakava, E., Mavromatis, A., Chachalis, D., and Goulas, C. (2006). Effect of grafting on growth and yield of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) in greenhouse and open-field. J. Appl. Hortic. 8, 3–7.
Kim, S. Jungb, J.Hwa Junga, J. Yoonb, N. Kang, S. Rohb, G. Hahm, J. (2020). Hypoglycemic efficacy and safety of Momordica charantia (bitter melon) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, Complementary Therapies in Medicine 52.
Krumbein, A., and Schwarz, D. (2013). Grafting: A possibility to enhance healthpromoting and flavour compounds in tomato fruits of shaded plants? Sci. Hortic. 149, 97–107.
Kung, W. Lin, C. Kuo, C. Juin, Y. Wu , P. and Lin, M. (2020). Wild Bitter Melon Exerts Anti-Inflammatory Effects by Upregulating Injury-Attenuated CISD2 Expression following Spinal Cord Injury, Hindawi Behavioural Neurology Volume 2020.
Kyriacou, M. C., and Soteriou, G. A. (2015). Quality and postharvest behavior of watermelon fruit in response to grafting on inter-specific cucurbit rootstocks. J. Food Qual. 38, 21–29.
Lee, J. M. & Oda, M. (2003). Grafting of herbaceous vegetable and ornamental crops. Horticultural Reviews, 28, 61-124.
Lee, J. M. (1994). Cultivation of grafted vegetables I. Current status, grafting methods, and benefits. HortScience, 29, 235-239.
Leonardi, C., and Giuffrida, F. (2006). Variation of plant growth and macronutrient uptake in grafted tomatoes and eggplants on three different rootstocks. Eur. J. Hortic. Sci. 71, 97–101.
Liu, Z. Gong, J. Huang, W. Lu, F. and Dong, H. (2021). The Effect of Momordica charantia in the Treatment of Diabetes, Hindawi, Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Volume 2021.
Mahwish, F. Saeed, M. Tauseef Sultan, Ayesha Riaz, Sagheer Ahmed, Nicusor Bigiu, Ryszard Amarowicz, and Rosana Manea. (2021). Bitter Melon (Momordica charantia L.) Fruit Bioactives Charantin and Vicine Potential for Diabetes Prophylaxis and Treatment, Plants ,, 10, 730.
Passam, H. C., Stylianoy, M., and Kotsiras, A. (2005). Performance of eggplant grafted on tomato and eggplant rootstocks. Eur. J. Hortic. Sci. 70, 130–134.
Proietti, S., Rouphael, Y., Colla, G., Cardarelli, M., De Agazio, M., Zacchini, M., et al. (2008). Fruit quality of mini-watermelon as affected by grafting and irrigation regimes. J. Sci. Food Agric. 88, 1107–1114.
Riga, P. (2015). Effect of rootstock on growth, fruit production and quality of tomato plants grown under low temperature and light conditions. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 56, 626–638.
Rouphael, Y., Cardarelli, M., Rea, E., and Colla, G. (2012). Improving melon and cucumber photosynthetic activity, mineral composition, and growth performance under salinity stress by grafting onto Cucurbita hybrid rootstocks. Photosynthetica 50, 180–188.
Rouphael, Y., Schwarz, D., Krumbein, A., and Colla, G. (2010). Impact of grafting on product quality of fruit vegetables. Sci. Hortic. 127, 172–179.
Salehi, R., Kashi, A., Lee, S. G., Huh, Y. C., Lee, J. M., Bablar, M. & Delshad, M. (2009). Assessing the survival and growth performance of Iranian melon to grafting onto cucurbita rootstocks. Journal of Horticultural Science, 27(1), 1-6. (In persian)
Schwarz, D., Öztekin, G. B., Tüzel, Y., Brückner, B., and Krumbein, A. (2013). Rootstocks canenhance tomato growth and quality characteristics at low potassium supply. Sci. Hortic. 149, 70–79.
Sing P. Tana, Tuyen C. Khab, Sophie E. Parksa,c, and Paul D. Roacha. (2016). Bitter melon (Momordica charantia L.) bioactive composition and health benefits: A review. Food Reviews International. VOL. 32, (2): 181–202.
Soteriou, G. A., Kyriacou, M. C., Siomos, A. S., and Gerasopoulos, D. (2014). Evolution of watermelon fruit physicochemical and phytochemical composition during ripening as affected by grafting. Food Chem. 165, 282–289.
Sur, S. and Ray, R. B. (2020). Bitter Melon (Momordica charantia), a Nutraceutical Approach for Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Cancers, 12, 2064.
Tarazona-Díaz, M. P., Viegas, J., Moldao-Martinsc, M., and Aguayoa, E. (2011). Bioactive compounds from flesh and by-product of fresh-cut watermelon cultivars. J. Sci. Food Agric. 91, 805–812.
Turhan, A., Ozmen, N., Serbeci, M. S., and Seniz, V. (2011). Effects of grafting on different rootstocks on tomato fruit yield and quality. Hortic. Sci. 38, 142–149.
Verzera, A., Dima, G., Tripodi, G., Condurso, C., Crinò, P., and Romano, D. (2014). Aroma and sensory quality of honeydew melon fruits (Cucumis melo L. subsp. Melo var. inodorus H. Jacq.) in relation to different rootstocks. Sci. Hortic. 169, 118–124.
Yamasaki, A., Yamashita, M. & Furuya, S. (1994(. Mineral concentrations and cytokinin activity in the xylem exudate of grafted watermelons as affected by rootstocks and crop load. Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science, 62, 817-826.
Yetisir, H., and Sari, N. (2003). Effect of different rootstock on plant growth, yield and quality of watermelon. Austr. J. Exp. Agric. 43, 1269–1274.
Yetisir, H., Sari, N., and Yncel, S. (2003). Rootstock resistance to Fusarium wilt and effect on watermelon fruit yield and quality. Phytoparasitica 31, 163–169.
Zijlstra, S., Groot, S. P. C. & Jansen, J. (1994). Genotypic variation of rootstocks for growth and production in cucumber; possibilities for improving the root system by plant breeding. Scientia Horticulturae, 56(3), 185-196.

  • Receive Date 16 May 2022
  • Revise Date 14 June 2022
  • Accept Date 14 June 2022