Nitrogen supply management in sweet corn intercropped with kidney bean

Tavazoee, Saba; Khoramivafa, Mahmud

doi:10.22034/iuvs.2024.2042471.1390

Nitrogen supply management in sweet corn intercropped with kidney bean

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Saba Tavazoee ¹

Mahmud Khoramivafa ²

¹ Former BSc Student, Department of Production Engineering and Plant Genetics, Agriculture and Natural Resources Campus, Razi University

² Associated professor, Department of Production Engineering and Plant Genetics, Agriculture and Natural Resources Campus, Razi University

10.22034/iuvs.2024.2042471.1390

Abstract

Extended Abstract
1.      Introduction: One of the most multipurpose cropping is the use of mechanization and agricultural machinery is during the harvesting period. Therefore, the plants that are harvested currently by hand in sole cropping systems can get rid of this limitation successfully. In this connection, the cultivation of both sweet corn and kidney beans can be a suitable option for introducing it in multiple cropping systems. Additionaly sweet corn intercropped with beans can be advantageous due to the additional price, direct market, and hand harvesting. This agricultural system is also efficient ecologically because of the structural differences, low interspecific competition, and improved use of environmental factors such as light, water, and soil nitrogen content. In addition, the issue of using chemical fertilizers is very important, especially in vegetables that are used directly and fresh, such as sweet corn. In this regard, Intercropping can use resources efficiently compared to pure cropping, at the same time as increasing the total yield per unit area and increasing the efficiency of nutrient consumption. Mixed cropping is also considered a method to reduce losses of high-use elements, especially nitrogen.
2.      Materials and Methods: In order to investigate the nitrogen effect on the sweet corn intercropped with kidney bean, an experiment was conducted in the 2017-2018 growing season as split plots designe based on a randomized complete block design in three replications. The main plots were the management of nitrogen consumption from the source of urea fertilizer (80, 160, 240 kg/ha and controls) and the intercropping pattern (one row of corn, one row of kidney bean, one row of corn, two rows of kidney bean, two rows of corn, one row of kidney bean, kidney bean and sweet corn purecropping) formed as sub-plots. Each subplot consisted of six rows of three meters long and 50 cm row spacing for both sweet corn and kidney bean, with the four middle rows considered for sampling. One square meter from the middle of each plot was harvested at 70-75% humidity in order to determine the yield and yield components of sweet corn. Some intercropping indicators were used to evaluate mixed cultivation compared to pure cultivation, including Land Equivalent Ratio (LER), Relative Value Total (RVT), Productivity Index (PI), and Competition Index (CI).
3.      Results and Discussion: The results showed that nitrogen consumption and intercropping affect the number of seed rows, cob length, cob diameter, stem diameter, cannable seed weight, total fresh weight, dry weight of seeds, and biological yield. Also, the number of seeds per row, cob length, cannable grain weight, grain dry weight, and biological yield were significantly affected by the interaction of nitrogen and planting arrangement. The treatment combination of 240 kg/ha of nitrogen fertilizer along with the cultivation pattern of two rows of corn and one row of beans was better than other treatment combinations based on the measured traits. Also, the pattern of planting two rows of sweet corn and one row of beans showed its superiority in terms of cob length (32.64 cm) and the number of seeds per cob (35.75). The highest RVT value total was related to the control and cultivation of two rows of sweet corn and one row of kidney beans, with the consumption of 80 kg/ha of nitrogen fertilizer (0.86 and 0.85, respectively). The CI was also positive in the control treatment and the cultivation of one row of sweet corn and two rows of kidney beans, which indicates the dominance of sweet corn in mixed cropping. Ultimately, the combination treatment of 80 and 160 kg/ha and the intercrop pattern of one row of sweet corn and two rows of beans had the highest index of land equality ratio (1.16).
4.      Conclusion: Mixed cultivation of one row of sweet corn and two rows of red beans had the highest index of land equality ratio. Also, the estimation of the competition index in most of the intercropping treatments showed that sweet corn was the dominant species and used the environmental conditions more favorably. However, due to the lack of a significant difference between the yield obtained in the treatments of 160 and 240 kilograms of nitrogen per hectare, it is possible to save on fertilizer consumption and costs by using 160. Finally, according to the performance and economic indicators, the combinations of two rows of sweet corn with one row of red beans or one row of sweet corn and two rows of red beans, with consumption of 160 and 240 kg per hectare, can be introduced as the best treatments in this research.

Keywords

Panting arrangement

Biological yield

Land equivalent ratio

Cannable grain weight

Abbasdokht, H. Shafaghi, A. & Gholipoor, M. (2021). Effect of biological and chemical sources of nitrogen fertilizer on quantitative and qualitative characteristics of maize and fenugreek forage in an additive intercropping series. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science. 52(1):61-73. Https://doi.org/10.22059/ijfcs.2020.271663 654558. (In Persian)

Ahmadizad, Z. Abbasi. N. & hajinia, S. (2023). Investigation of some Growth Characteristics and Yield of Safflower in Intercropping With Lentils under Weed Management Conditions. Sustainable Agriculture and Production Science. 33(3): 17-33. Https://doi.org/10.22034/saps.2022.50465.2829. (In Persian)

Ahmadian, A. & Rezadoost, S. (2013). The effect of planting arrangement on delayed intercropping of corn and beans. Journal of Research in Agriculture Sciences. 6 (22): 121-136. (In Persian)

Amiri, A., Mahdavi, B. & Rafiee, M. (2022). Effect of different intercropping patterns of common millet and cow pea on yield and yield components. Journal of Plant Production Research. 29(4): 203-230.Https://doi.org/10.22069/JOPP.2022.19987.2920. (In Persian)

Araghian, S., Sadrabadi Haghighi, R. & Ghasemi, M. (2021). Yield response and Intercropping Index of Quinoa and Guar medicinal plants to different ratios of intercropping in Mashhad conditions. Crop Production Journal. 14(1): 85-104. Https://doi.org/10.22069/EJCP.2022.19011.2417. (In Persian)

Asadi, G.A., Khorramdel, S., Shahriary, R., Ranjbar, F. & Aghhavani Shajari, M. (2016). Effect of replacement intercropping ratios of sweet corn with bean varieties on yield and yield components. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research. 8(2): 192-204. Https://doi.org/1022067./ijpr.v8i2.50084. (In Persian)

Babakhani, V. Tohidi-Nejad, E. & Khajoei-Nejad, GH. (2023). Biomass Production and Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Dill-Fenugreek Intercropping in Response to Biofertilizers and Manure. Sustanable Agriculture and Production Science. 32(4): 1-18. Https://doi.org/10.22034/saps.2022.48673.2759 (In Persian)

Banik, B., A. Midya, B. K. Sarkar & S. S. Ghose. (2006). Wheat and chickpea intercropping systems in an additive series experiment: Advantages and weed smothering. Europ. J. Agron. 24: 325-332.

Dhima, K.V., Lithourgidis, A.A., Vasilakoglou, I.B., & Dordas, C.A. (2007). Competition indices of common vetch and cereal intercrops in two seeding ratios. Field Crops Research. 100(2-3), 249-256.

Dahmardeh, M. & Keshtegar, A. (2014). Evaluation of yield and yield components of maize (Zea mays L.) in intercropping with peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.). Journal of Agroecology. 6 (20): 311-323. (In Persian)

Dargahi, M., & Sovhani Darban. A. R. (2021). Studying the effect of mixed cultivation of corn with beans on the amount of dry matter produced and fodder quality. New Findings of Agriculture. 11 (3): 153-163. (In Persian)

Dai, J., Qiu, W., Wang, N., Wang, T., Nakanishi, H. & Zuo, Y. (2019). From leguminosae/gramineae intercropping systems to see the benefits of intercropping on iron nutrition. Frontiers in Plant Science. 10, 605.

Farid, M. and Navabi, A. (2015). N2 fixation ability of different dry bean genotypes. Can. J. Plant Sci. 95: 1243_1257.

Finley, K.A.B., & Ryan, M.R. (2018). Advancing intercropping research and practices in industrialized agricultural landscapes. Agriculture. 8(80), 1-24.

Ghanbari, S., Moradi Talavat, M., and Siadat, S.A. (2017). Evaluation of competitive indices in barley intercropped with fenugreek under manure applications. Journal of Crops Improvement. 18(4), 821-834. (In Persian)

Haghjoo, M. and A. Bahrani. (2014). Effect of irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer on grain yield, yield components, and dry matter remobilization of maize cv. SC 260. Iran. J. Crop Sci. 16(4): 278-292. (In Persian)

Haji Ramezani, F. Barmaki, M. & Dashti, GH. (2023). Evaluate the Competitiveness and Usefulness of Potato and Local Faba Bean Intercropping in the Sarab City. Sustainable Agriculture and Production Science. 33(1): 251-267. Https://doi.org/10.22034/saps.2022.50023.2819 (In Persian)

Hamzei, J. Nejafi, H. & Babaei, M. (2017). Effect of Irrigation and Nitrogen on Agronomic Parameters, Yield, Grain Quality, and Agronomic Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research. 14(4): 686-698. Https://doi.org/10.22069/JOPP.2022.19809.2903. (In Persian)

Hosseinzadeh, S. Jahan, M. Nassiri Mahallati, M. & Mohammadnia Ghalibaf, K. H. (2019). Effect of intercropping replacement ratios of maize (Zea mays L.) and bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) on yield and nitrogen use efficiency indices. Journal of Agriculture Sciences of Iran. 20(4): 267-287. Https://doi.org/10.22059/IJFCS.2020.294043.654669. (In Persian)

Jonathan, D. C. (2008). Intercropping with maize in sub-Arid Regions. Community planting and Analysis. Definition and benefits of intercropping. Technical Brief. April, 16.

Khairkhwah, Kh. Koocheki, A. Nassiri Mahallati, M. & Khorramdel, S. (2022). The effect of increasing genetic diversity through the mixture of wheat cultivars on nitrogen efficiencies and water productivity. Applied Research in Field Crops. 35(3): 1-27. Https://doi.org/10.22092/aj.2023.361206.1632. (In Persian)

Koorawand, A. Fateh, E. & Aynehband, A. (2023). Investigating the Effect of Intercropping of Sesame, Mung Bean, and Cowpea on Crop Profitability Indices. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science. 54(3), 177-190. (In Persian)

Mazaheri, D. (1979). Intercropping with maize and kale. United Kingdom. Thesis, Reading University. Ph. D. Dissertation.

Mehni, J., Mahdavi, B., Azari, A., Afkar, A. & Hashemi, E. (2020). Evaluation of yield and productivity indices of black cumin and fenugreek intercropping under weedy and weed-free conditions. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science. 51(3): 73-87. Https://doi.org/10.22059/ijfcs.2019.253533. 65445 (In Persian)

Nabati nasaz, M., Gholipouri, A., and Mostafavi Rad, M. (2016). Evaluation of Forage Yield and Important Agronomic Indices of Corn Affected by Intercropping Systems with Peanut and Nitrogen Rates. Journal of Agronomy, 8(1): 70-81. Https://doi.org/10.22067/jag.v8i1.34136‎. (In Persian)

Nasrollahzadeh Asl, A., Chavoshgoli, A., Valizadegan, E., Valiloo, R., and Nasrollahzadeh Asl, V. (2012). Evaluation of sunflower (Heliantus annus L.) and pinto bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) intercropping based on the additive method. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology, 6 (2): 111-126.

Pourkarami, E., Dahmardeh, M., Galavi, M. & Khmmar, I. (2023). Evolution of Yield and Yield Components of Peanut Affected as Row Intercropping of Replacement Series Roselle in Different Nitrogen Levels. Journal of Crops Improvement. 25(4): 879-891. (In Persian)

Raisi, A. Aroiee, H. Nabavi Kalat, M. & Nemati, H. (2020). Intercropping effect of two melon cultivars and four medicinal plant species on the pest control and fruit yield in melon. Iranian Journal of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants. 35(6): 967-976. (In Persian)

Rezapour Kavishahi, T. Sayfzadeh, S. Mostafavi Rad, M. Valadabady, A. R. & Hadidi Masouleh, E. (2021). Influence of Integrated Application of Phosphorus Fertilizers on Grain Yield of Groundnut under Intercropping with Corn. Journal of Improvement of Agriculture. 24(1): 253-267. (In Persian)

Sakhavi, SH. Amini, R. and Shakiba, M. R. (2016). Advantage of Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.) and Cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.) Intercropping under Organic, Biological and Chemical Fertilizer Treatments. Journal of agricultural knowledge and sustainable production. 26(4): 17-32.

Salehi Sheikhi, M., Nakhzari Moghaddam, A., Rahemi Karizaki, A. & Mohammad Esmaili, M. (2021). Effect of Pea Cultivar and Replacement and Additive Intercropping Ratios of Pea and Spinach on Yield and Competition Indices. Journal of Improvement of Agriculture. 23(4): 939-952. Https://doi.org/10.22059/jci.2020.302557.2395. (In Persian)

Seyedi, S. M. and Hamzei, J. (2020). Evaluation of advantageous of sunflower grain legume intercropping. Crop and Horticultural Science Research. 13(1): 85-98. (In Persian)

Wang, X., Deng, X., Pu, T., Song, C., Yong, T., Yang, F., and Yang, W. (2017). Contribution of interspecificinteractions and phosphorus application to increasing soil phosphorus availability in relay intercropping systems. Field Crops Research, 204, 12-22.

Zhang, D., W. Li, C. Xin, W. Tang, A. E. Eneji & H. Dong. (2012). Lint yield and nitrogen use efficiency of field-grown cotton vary with soil salinity and nitrogen application rate. Field Crops Res. 138: 63-70.

Ziaei, H., Pirdashti, H., Zare, S. & Mottaghian, A. (2015). Evaluation of seed yield and competition indices of corn (Zea mays L.) intercropped with different bean (Phaseolus spp.) types. Journal of Agroecology, 7(1), 52-61 (In Persian)

Zotarelli, L., Rens, L.R, Cantliffe, D.J, Stoffella, P.J, Gergela, D. & Burhans, D. (2015). Rate and timing of nitrogen fertilizer application on potato ‘FL1867’. Part I: Plant nitrogen uptake and soil nitrogen availability. Field Crops Research, 183, 246-256.

Willey, R.W. & Rao, M.R. (1980). A competitive ratio for quantifying competition between intercrops. Experimental Agriculture. 16: 117- 125.